CDP season, without the scramble.
The CDP questionnaire becomes a managed workflow — questions assigned, evidenced, evaluated against published level allocations and approved before submission. Draft recovery protects the work; indicative projections show where evidence needs attention.
500+ questionnaire items don't fit in an inbox.
Disclosure work often spreads across spreadsheets, inboxes and disconnected evidence. Ownership becomes unclear, review happens late and teams struggle to see gaps before submission.
Coordination by email
Owners, deadlines and drafts scattered across inboxes. Nobody can say what's done, what's stuck, or who has the latest version.
Evidence hunted, not held
Last year's answers and their supporting files live in someone's old laptop. Every season starts from zero.
Gaps found too late
When evidence or allocation gaps surface after review, there may be little time to improve the response. Indicative views help direct attention before submission.
Import the bank. Assign. Answer. Evaluate. Lock & Send.
Import
The 2026 question bank, structured by module — with per-question guidance and character limits enforced where CDP enforces them.
Assign
Owners and due dates per question, inline — no separate assignment screen, no duplicate lists, no lost threads.
Answer
Autosave and draft recovery help protect work; evidence stays attached where it belongs; cleared data-fabric suggestions appear beside mapped questions.
Evaluate
See available and achievable Disclosure, Awareness, Management and Leadership allocations against saved responses.
Lock & Send
Answers enter the configurable L1→L4 approval chain with an audit log. What leaves the building is what leadership signed.
The workflow, in your hands.
Interactive slices of the workflow using illustrative data. Where a control is conceptual rather than product scoring logic, it is labelled accordingly.
DAML allocation guide
Explore what the four published scoring levels represent. Configured allocation checks use question applicability and saved answers; this guide is not a CDP score.
Management. Policies, actions, targets and accountability demonstrate that the issue is being managed.
Preparation lens — not a CDP score
A conceptual way to discuss coverage, management evidence and verification. Drag the inputs to expose the next preparation priority.
Conceptual planning aid only. The product projection uses question- and theme-level allocations; final CDP scoring can also depend on answer quality, essential criteria, sector rules and human assessment.
Lock & Send — the L1→L4 chain
An answer's journey from author to authorised. Step through it.
Author locks. The answer is frozen exactly as written before sign-off begins.
⇄ Answers from the data fabric
Mapped questions get cleared platform figures suggested beside the field. Accept one.
Uncleared data is never suggested. Every pull is recorded in the fabric audit trail.
Autosave that means it
Draft persistence, recovery on return and an atomic save-and-lock reduce the risk of losing work during a long disclosure cycle.
Response history & evidence
Retain the response trail, attachments, ownership and review state together, so the next cycle begins with governed context instead of inbox archaeology.
Audit log & governed exports
Who changed what, when, at which approval level — plus exports that respect lock state, so nothing half-approved escapes.
Make disclosure season a process, not a panic.
We'll walk the 2026 bank, map your approval chain and show how saved answers, evidence and indicative allocation views work together.